Showing posts with label 1930's. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1930's. Show all posts

02 October 2005

M (1931)


German expressionism, rising from the ashes of the recently lost WWI, this style of filmmaking is filled with dark, mysterious images that generally include horror, death, and violence. From these key points, it is easy to see why many German expressionist films were monster movies, such as Nosferatu, eine Symphonie des Grauens (1922). Even when many directors fled Germany because of WWII, German expressionism surfaced in America with Universal's famous 'Monster Movies'. One of the most famous films of this time period, Fritz Lang's M, is a masterpiece that grips the viewer with fear and suspense, even over 70 years after its creation. Lang's ability to use the right amounts of light and sound cause an amazing moving picture to emerge. Playing with the minds of both the characters of the film and the people of the audience, M is a film that is viewed by many to be the most psychological thriller of all time.

Although M may not have the digital quality or CGI special effects of today, it certainly makes up for it with the excellent storyline, the amazing Mise-en-Scene, and the spectacular acting. M is the story of Hans Beckert (Peter Lorre), a psychotic child murderer, whose current score is 8. Fortunately for us, the police are working 'hard' to find this evil man. However, after discovering he is not hiding in the local restaurant, in the station, or any other place that the police enjoy hanging out, everyone becomes frustrated. The criminals (yes, criminals) are frustrated too; with police raids every day, this child murderer becomes bad for 'business'. Schränker (Gustaf Gründgens), the head of the criminal union, organizes a joint collaboration between them and the beggar union to find this child murder.

Compared to the stories of today, this film does not seem to exceed. In addition to that, the poor quality of sound and picture do not appeal to many. How is this film such a big hit then? It is Fritz Lang's amazing ability to display the right amount of imagery and sound. M is considered by many to be the first 'talking picture' success. Why is this? Most of it has to do with Lang's distrust with the sound. He refused to have sound in this film, but obviously and ultimately lost. (One might say in retaliation) Lang has almost no sound in M, which gives it the suspense it needs. It is said that whenever there is a lack of non-diegetic sound for more then a minute and a half, the audience begins to feel awkward and nervous. This becomes very helpful in M. Especially in the final chase scene, the lack of sound creates an atmosphere that feels as if there is no one there, as if help will never arrive. The lack of sound also causes the viewer to concentrate on the screen more then the sound. This also becomes effective in the film, as shown during important times such as the court scene.

M is also famous for the many psychological views that are brought up. For instance, when trying to capture Beckert, the police are worthless while the criminals are organized and skilful. Even the different justice system they show could be viewed with much shock. The 'correct' version of justice that the police advertise would have Beckert eventually released back into the public with little to no punishment. However, the criminals wish to give Beckert a taste of his own medicine, or an eye for an eye. As Schränker says to Beckert, "You talk of rights? You will get your rights." Although the reader of this review may believe that the official rules of justice to be correct, Lang shows the criminal side to be . . . better. The criminal side of the law is more sympathetic with that of the victims. Since Beckert could never feel the pain of a Mother's sorrow, the criminals would like to show Beckert how it felt to be on the opposite side of the knife. The other hand of the law, however, believes that "No one can kill a man that isn't responsible for his actions" as Beckert himself said that these impulses to kill are involuntary.

This leads to another theme Lang shows us in his film. Beckert, who fights "this evil thing inside of me, the fire, the voices, the torment!" eventually looses (8 times) as the murderer takes control. The murder is quite fond for the song "In the Hall of the Mountain King", and it becomes an audio metonymy for the impulse of killing children. In a wonderful scene, Beckert is trying his best to drown out the sounds of his own whistling, the sounds of "In the Hall of the Mountain King". Failing (again) to defeat the evil inside, Beckert continues to stalk a little child, who trusts him enough to give him a knife. Why trust a stranger when there is a murderer on the loose? Because of Lang's ability to show the face of a murderer to be . . . normal. In the time period that M is filmed, many believed that the face showed the characteristics of the mind. Beckert looks as normal as any other man on the street, continuing the fear that a murderer can be anyone.

Based on the real life murderer, Peter Kürten (the vampire of Düsseldorf), M is an amazing film that explores the vast topic of psychology. This review has just touched the many, many themes that Lang shows in his masterpiece film. Although it is in black and white, the sound and visual quality of the film is poor, and the language is German (necessity of subtitles), M is a film that should be seen by all. For its wonderful Mise-en-Scene, or the excellent story, M will be enjoyed by anyone who wishes to view it.

29 September 2005

Mise-en-Scene: M (1931)

Mise-en-Scene!? What's that! Well, besides that atrocious food I ate for lunch, it's French for "placing into a scene". It is the term for what the director does before the camera; how the scene is presented to the audience. For example, if the scene is presented in a dark manner, and has a giant downward arrow in it, the director may be trying to convey the foreboding downward path a character may take soon.

Fritz Lang's masterpiece film M (1931) is an M-azing watch, with each scene thoughtfully planned and placed by the director. Two such examples are the scene captures to the left and right of this entry. A horrible child murderer is wandering through the streets of Germany, already killing 8 children. The cops, unable to cause any real threat to this murderer, feebly attempt to create a plan to capture this crook. However, in the second scene, the everyday criminals are planning to capture the murderer too (and do a much better job than the cops).

In the Cop scene, one can see the circles created by the compass. It creates the illusion that the town is a bullseye; a technique that should hopefully catch the murderer. However, this is an illusion of safety itself, for there is a very small chance that the cops will catch the murderer. As in the game of darts, all your money is on the fact that a bullseye will be hit. If not, then the dart will land on the outskirts. In the scene, the town is placed in the bullseye, however it is all based on luck that the cops will get this bullseye. More likely, they will hit the outskirts. This is shown many times in the film, mostly through the means the Cops are attempting to catch the murderer. The Cops are truly running in circles.

In the Criminal scene, a black hand covers a map of the town, similar to the map of the previous scene. (Interestingly enough, Hitler and the Nazis were
big fans of Lang, and based their uniforms of the Gestapo on the clothes that the character Schränker, whose hand is shown here, wears in this film.) Unlike that of the previous scene, there is no false security based on dumb luck (mostly the dumb). Instead, a well developed plan is formed, as can be seen in this scene. With no words to accompany this picture, one can see that a hand is grasping the town, trying to strangle the murderer out of hiding. Unlike the "the murderer somewhere here" attitude of the cops, Schränker knows the murderer is in the town, and causes a giant undercover search to start. In addition to the grasping of Schränker, this scene feels much darker than the previous one, showing a darker intention of what should happen to this child murderer.

M is an amazing film. If you get a chance to see it, grasp it as fast as Schränker. Lang's expression through Mise-en-Scene is not the only thing to watch out for though, M's amazing ability to give fear and suspense (with little to no sound) is a characteristic that causes it to be loved by many a film critic even to this day.